Rejected payables shouldn't need changes to go back through approval process

Currently if a payable is rejected, some type of change must be made to the coding, vendor, etc in order for AgilLink to kick it back into the approval process.

Changes to the payable including adding backup and adding a detailed description are not enough to put the payable back into approvals.

It takes a lot of extra time to make an unnecessary change just to get the payable back into approvals.

If a payable is rejected, the first approver should be able to reapprove regardless of if a change or certain type of change has been made.